Terry Simner
Senior Member & Supporter
At this time of the year, especially when there's been such little rainfall, many large catches of barbel appear to come from fast/broken water and immediately below rapids..lets say water travelling at over 8mph and being less than 2ft, or thereabouts.
(Its often said that fish congregate there due to low oxygen levels. Hmmmm, not sure that's true outside of a prolonged heat-wave. IMHO, its just that they don't disperse immediately after spawning on the shallows but stay 'shoaled up' and localised)
I've indulged in fishing these areas many times, and have taken many fish, but have found that the average size of these said fish is significantly lower than fish taken from slower/deeper areas. Especially slower/deeper areas maybe 100-200m below rapids.
Yes I'm one for statistics, and this is what I've found. Has anyone else found the same or similar?
And from this...are fish taken by the 'rolling meat' method liable /likely to be smaller than by (say) static bait methods? Yeah I know there'll be exceptions e.g.. "well my p.b. came from rolling...." but I'm talking 'on average'.
Thoughts??
(Its often said that fish congregate there due to low oxygen levels. Hmmmm, not sure that's true outside of a prolonged heat-wave. IMHO, its just that they don't disperse immediately after spawning on the shallows but stay 'shoaled up' and localised)
I've indulged in fishing these areas many times, and have taken many fish, but have found that the average size of these said fish is significantly lower than fish taken from slower/deeper areas. Especially slower/deeper areas maybe 100-200m below rapids.
Yes I'm one for statistics, and this is what I've found. Has anyone else found the same or similar?
And from this...are fish taken by the 'rolling meat' method liable /likely to be smaller than by (say) static bait methods? Yeah I know there'll be exceptions e.g.. "well my p.b. came from rolling...." but I'm talking 'on average'.
Thoughts??