• You need to be a registered member of Barbel Fishing World to post on these forums. Some of the forums are hidden from non-members. Please refer to the instructions on the ‘Register’ page for details of how to join the new incarnation of BFW...

Favorite hook size for barbel?

What size hook do you use most for barbel?

  • Size 1-2

    Votes: 6 2.1%
  • Size 3-4

    Votes: 2 0.7%
  • Size 5-6

    Votes: 26 9.2%
  • Size 7-8

    Votes: 94 33.1%
  • Size 9-10

    Votes: 116 40.8%
  • Size 11-12

    Votes: 30 10.6%
  • Size 13-14

    Votes: 8 2.8%
  • Size 15-16

    Votes: 2 0.7%

  • Total voters
    284
You're dead right Neil, one size of hook won't fit all sizes of bait, but i always use a size of bait that will suit a size 6 or 4, even so the size may vary a bit, but as i said if i'm using a bigger bait than usual i increase the length of hair to compensate, there's a limit to how far you can go obviously, but in the same respect as i don't use very small baits, i don't use massive ones either, though i have done to experiment.

There are several reasons i don't use size 14's or similar, firstly the kind of areas i fish tend to have snags a plenty, and often in summer at least dense areas of streamer, cabbages etc.
I know for sure i'd be losing a high percentage of my Barbel by allowing them to dictate the fight, a river with wide open areas free of snags in the area, would allow you the scope to not have to play them so hard, but not on the rivers i mostly fish.

There are other reasons though, such as using size 14's with the much smaller bait that would usually imply, would certainly increase the risk of hooking smaller fish, Dace, Roach, Chublets, which ( possibly in my paranoia ! :p ) i'm certain will spook a big Barbel nearby that i've been trying so hard to catch.

It's fine for a fun days fishing catching whatever comes along, but hooking an angry double in a small river on something like a 14, with snags and weed everywhere..... i'm certain i'd lose quite a few either to them finding sanctuary because of playing them gently, or to hook pulls when i had to pile the pressure on.

I know other anglers use smaller sizes than me with success, but many tell me of losing a good fish to hook pulls - 'what size hooks are you using'... 10's .. 12's is often the answer, i like the insurance of a fairly big hook Neil, i like the confidence it gives me to put a healthy bend in my rod in stopping the run of a powerful big fish - nothing will convince me to go smaller ! Stick in the mud me ! :p

Ian.

Ian would I be right in saying that most of your fishing is done in darkness ? and that is why you can use such large hooks ? with out fear of fish being spooked by such a large hook ?
 
Ian would I be right in saying that most of your fishing is done in darkness ? and that is why you can use such large hooks ? with out fear of fish being spooked by such a large hook ?

Well it depends on the time of year Joe, it's only in the depths of winter that all of my fishing is in darkness, summer months it gradually increases, but right now at least half the session is in daylight, but the fish do tend to come after dark.
As far as the Barbel spooking in daylight being able to see a black hook ?

I would imagine much of the time they could see it, but could they identify it ?

If it were a shiny Drennan specialist or Specimen maybe they could.

Usually at this time of year i have my share of daylight captures, which hasn't been the case this year :confused:with no change in the size of hooks i use.
I just think the hours of darkness are when the bigger fish tend to feed, especially if there is little competition for the food, i don't think it's because they can identify a bigger hook by sight.

Ian.
 
Well it depends on the time of year Joe, it's only in the depths of winter that all of my fishing is in darkness, summer months it gradually increases, but right now at least half the session is in daylight, but the fish do tend to come after dark.
As far as the Barbel spooking in daylight being able to see a black hook ?

I would imagine much of the time they could see it, but could they identify it ?

If it were a shiny Drennan specialist or Specimen maybe they could.

Usually at this time of year i have my share of daylight captures, which hasn't been the case this year :confused:with no change in the size of hooks i use.
I just think the hours of darkness are when the bigger fish tend to feed, especially if there is little competition for the food, i don't think it's because they can identify a bigger hook by sight.

Ian.

Ian you make some interesting points . You say that most of your fish do come after dark ? So perhaps they do see the hook and it spooks them in day light hours ? and you say you do have your share of daylight fish and it not been the case this year .

I wonder if it could be to do with the amount of rain we have had this year compared with what we had last year ?
I assume due to lack of rain this year the Lodden has been clearer and lower than last year and that might explain why you have had less day time captures ? Just a thought .
With a river that is up and coloured I would assume you would get more day time captures because they cant see the hook than on one which was low and clear where they can see the hook ?
 


These are the hooklengths i generaly use Joe, if you click the bar on the top of the picture it will show them pretty much full size.

I have to admit your reasoning is very plausible, if it were correct would be the answer to why most of my Barbel come at night.

But having said that we aren't a million miles apart because as you see my hooklengths are either black, or very dark green - shown are black, my hooks are always black ( ESP's ) and that's because it just gives me more confidence that my hooklengths are as hard to see as possible, and is the reason i switched to ESP's in preference to Drennan specialist or specimen, so i'm already half way onside with your opinion.

If a Barbel can see the hook, then ( and i'm guessing here ) it would have to be from at least 3" or 4" away, any closer, and it wouldn't be able to, it would have to identify it in amongst the detrius on the bottom, and even on a clear gravel bottom where the hook is likley lying in between stones, i reckon would be pretty difficult, i'd hestitate to say impossible, but i'm pretty confident that in the vast majority of cases it wouldn't recognise the hook - or hooklenth for that matter by sight.

If by using a smaller hook it does in fact bring more takes, my guess is it would be because of the smaller bait that would usually accompany it, and the ease with which hook and bait enters the Barbels mouth when it's grubbing around on a bed of loose feed - i've thought of that on many occasions, but just can't bring myself to use anything close to a 14, and even bigger given the size of the Barbel i'm hoping to hook, and in the majority of situations on very narrow stretches, by big river standards with snags left right and center, and often dense areas of weed in the immediate vicinity to be honest it'd bloody terrify me ! :eek: :D

But you do make a persuasive argument Joe ! ;)

Ian
Edit..... it would have to be from at least 3" or 4" away - i've just thought about that !

I'm forgetting that it would be able to see something only an inch away or less if it were viewing from the side, and not directly in front, it's really at the point it actually eats something it can't see it.
 
Last edited:
Ian/Joe- interesting discussion this. But can I add to the mix, the weight of the hook? When feeding, barbel rely, mostly I think, on touch and smell and are clearly super efficient at filtering. So, when feeding on pellets say, are they ejecting hook baits (hair rigged pellets) because they sense the additional weight and resistance? How many times do we barbel anglers describe the knocks and rattles as the annoying activities of chub (or dace/roach/bream etc) when they could be barbel, picking up and then instantly ejecting the bait, never giving us time to strike (and because we are waiting for the 3ft twitch)? At these times I have often resorted to touch ledgering and this has often resulted in a fish because I have responded far more quickly to an early indication of a take. Imagining it has been chub causing the taps and rattles, I have then been surprised to be hooked into a barbel.

Of course barbel are greedy and a bit stupid so at some point a fish won't be able to resist so picks up the bait and moves off with sufficient confidence to enable a sold register on the rod tip. So for me, the relativity of bait size to hook size is important because of the weight dynamic and one thing I haven't really tried is using something to help counter balance the weight of the hook.

I think at night when barbel are naturally more confident, the balance between hook and bait size can be exaggerated. There will also be other scenarios when it won't seem to matter either. Very hungry fish feeding enthusiastically and competitively for example. I experienced that dynamic for the first time when fishing the Wye. Spells where you couldn't put the rod down after casting because of the almost instant take you would get ( even before the feeder had emptied).

Personally, with rigs etc, I think a barbel's behaviour and confidence is more impacted by what they feel/sense rather than what they see. Cover is vital to them to operate with a general feeling of confidence and darkness provides that in abundance allowing them to roam and feed more confidently.
 
A 4O Aberdeen great for maggots you can get nearly half a pint on one of them, or a XXL wide gape 12 for a large lump of meat.
 
Ian/Joe- interesting discussion this. But can I add to the mix, the weight of the hook? When feeding, barbel rely, mostly I think, on touch and smell and are clearly super efficient at filtering. So, when feeding on pellets say, are they ejecting hook baits (hair rigged pellets) because they sense the additional weight and resistance? How many times do we barbel anglers describe the knocks and rattles as the annoying activities of chub (or dace/roach/bream etc) when they could be barbel, picking up and then instantly ejecting the bait, never giving us time to strike (and because we are waiting for the 3ft twitch)? At these times I have often resorted to touch ledgering and this has often resulted in a fish because I have responded far more quickly to an early indication of a take. Imagining it has been chub causing the taps and rattles, I have then been surprised to be hooked into a barbel.

Of course barbel are greedy and a bit stupid so at some point a fish won't be able to resist so picks up the bait and moves off with sufficient confidence to enable a sold register on the rod tip. So for me, the relativity of bait size to hook size is important because of the weight dynamic and one thing I haven't really tried is using something to help counter balance the weight of the hook.

I think at night when barbel are naturally more confident, the balance between hook and bait size can be exaggerated. There will also be other scenarios when it won't seem to matter either. Very hungry fish feeding enthusiastically and competitively for example. I experienced that dynamic for the first time when fishing the Wye. Spells where you couldn't put the rod down after casting because of the almost instant take you would get ( even before the feeder had emptied).

Personally, with rigs etc, I think a barbel's behaviour and confidence is more impacted by what they feel/sense rather than what they see. Cover is vital to them to operate with a general feeling of confidence and darkness provides that in abundance allowing them to roam and feed more confidently.

Howard I dont know if you have ever seen Barbel days and ways and seen the clip where the guy drops in a load of pellets and in a matter of minutes the Barbel arrive and you can clearly see that they are filtering any rubbish out they have picked up along with the pellets and quickley spit out the rubbish .

Whether they can tell the difference when they suck up a pellet with a hook attached to it and thats why they spit it out . Or a single pellet with a bit of rubbish attached to it . Either way they spit out the none food item which they have sucked up and just carry on looking for more and dont move far and thats why you just get the taps and knocks ? Perhaps its just a theory ? and yet for what ever reason another time when the fish has picked up your bait you get the 3ft twitch
 


These are the hooklengths i generaly use Joe, if you click the bar on the top of the picture it will show them pretty much full size.

I have to admit your reasoning is very plausible, if it were correct would be the answer to why most of my Barbel come at night.

But having said that we aren't a million miles apart because as you see my hooklengths are either black, or very dark green - shown are black, my hooks are always black ( ESP's ) and that's because it just gives me more confidence that my hooklengths are as hard to see as possible, and is the reason i switched to ESP's in preference to Drennan specialist or specimen, so i'm already half way onside with your opinion.

If a Barbel can see the hook, then ( and i'm guessing here ) it would have to be from at least 3" or 4" away, any closer, and it wouldn't be able to, it would have to identify it in amongst the detrius on the bottom, and even on a clear gravel bottom where the hook is likley lying in between stones, i reckon would be pretty difficult, i'd hestitate to say impossible, but i'm pretty confident that in the vast majority of cases it wouldn't recognise the hook - or hooklenth for that matter by sight.

If by using a smaller hook it does in fact bring more takes, my guess is it would be because of the smaller bait that would usually accompany it, and the ease with which hook and bait enters the Barbels mouth when it's grubbing around on a bed of loose feed - i've thought of that on many occasions, but just can't bring myself to use anything close to a 14, and even bigger given the size of the Barbel i'm hoping to hook, and in the majority of situations on very narrow stretches, by big river standards with snags left right and center, and often dense areas of weed in the immediate vicinity to be honest it'd bloody terrify me ! :eek: :D

But you do make a persuasive argument Joe ! ;)

Ian
Edit..... it would have to be from at least 3" or 4" away - i've just thought about that !

I'm forgetting that it would be able to see something only an inch away or less if it were viewing from the side, and not directly in front, it's really at the point it actually eats something it can't see it.

Ian never having given it much thought till now , I have all ways used a size 8
hook for most of my fishing and have all ways been woried if I go any bigger .
It will spook the fish and I can understand your argument for using bigger hooks to avoid any possible hook pulls and the swims you fish and you want to be in total control when playing any hooked fish .
At the start of the season I lost 3 fish on a size 8 to hook pulls and will now consider changing to a size 6 and see what difference it makes ?
I suppose if you single minded in targeting bigger fish , Then you have to use the tackle and methods to suit . At the expense of trying to avoid catching smaller fish .
Another point you have made Ian about using smaller hooks and smaller baits comes the possibilty of hooking smaller fish and in turn spooking the bigger ones ?
 
For me hook size equates to bait size, if using a say 8m pellet than I would use a #14, anything up to a 2 for large meat that the hook is buried in. I believe hook size to bait is critical especially in conditions that we have at the moment. Matchmen are well educated in this, and as we know drop down a size or two when bites are not forthcoming.

The way Barbel feed is similar to carp, ie filter the food and blow out debris and retain any food particles, this seems to be especially true in the summer daylight hours when they grub for snails and bloodworm etc.

I believe at the moment Barbel are doing just that and gorging on natures plentiful larder so it would seem we have to match that with small particle baits, last summer was completely opposite where such feeding wasn't the main stay, so a large lump of meat was always the better option.

Many fish this summer have been caught on small pellet/ small hooks with lighter hook lengths, certainly the less than moderate number of fish I have caught all have come to this approach. In a session I often change baits and hook size, to try and 'buy' a bite, but the small baits have always produced more interest.

Not to say large meat won't catch, but I have been plagued by Eels, so my favourite bait is a non starter, unlike last summer.

Certainly believe Barbel, see, sense hooks, and surely a smaller hook will bring more bites?
 
That has been my experience too Neil so far this season. Even moving to a single 12mm pellet caused bites to dry up and then resume when I went back to 8mm-this was especially the case on the Wye. On the Kennet I have continued this approach into darkness and its worked very well so far.
 
Howard I dont know if you have ever seen Barbel days and ways and seen the clip where the guy drops in a load of pellets and in a matter of minutes the Barbel arrive and you can clearly see that they are filtering any rubbish out they have picked up along with the pellets and quickley spit out the rubbish .

Whether they can tell the difference when they suck up a pellet with a hook attached to it and thats why they spit it out . Or a single pellet with a bit of rubbish attached to it . Either way they spit out the none food item which they have sucked up and just carry on looking for more and dont move far and thats why you just get the taps and knocks ? Perhaps its just a theory ? and yet for what ever reason another time when the fish has picked up your bait you get the 3ft twitch

Yes I do recall watching that Joe. I think there was also some underwater footage where they put some massively colourful toy thing in the water as part of some test exploring how barbel can spook/not spook etc and I think the result was that the fish didn't seem at all troubled by the presence of something clearly unnatural for a river. Regarding the taps, rattles and knocks, you might be right. I think the fish do also go through a process (more so during the day I imagine) of feeding and then drifting back to nearby cover. When they do that almost immediately after sucking up the bait and then they feel the resistance of the rod tip etc you get a bolt rig type effect leading to the 3ft twitch.

On the catching the impossible series, when MB caught that big barbel from Adams Mill, wasn't there some underwater footage of barbel picking up and immediately spitting out the bait, and this registering as a pull/tap on the rod tip? As I said before, how many of us regard these as chub pulls?
 
Yep I reckon those little knocks and rattles a very often Barbel grubbing around, in such instances I really have to tell myself to be patient because I feel in such circumstanced the worst thing that I could do is to retrieve and recast. Hopefully the Barbel will come back, and the longer the rig is out there the less alarming it may become, but I don't know I really don't, and that is the fascination in what we do.
 
Yep I reckon those little knocks and rattles a very often Barbel grubbing around, in such instances I really have to tell myself to be patient because I feel in such circumstanced the worst thing that I could do is to retrieve and recast. Hopefully the Barbel will come back, and the longer the rig is out there the less alarming it may become, but I don't know I really don't, and that is the fascination in what we do.

Indeed it is and God forbid we ever get all the answers. That would be terrible- I don't want the journey to end.
 
There are other factors to consider in all of this. For instance, my main venue is absolutely crawling with crayfish....and they grow to 8" or 9" long. There are so many of them (despite professional trappers) that they are on your bait almost instantly, giving you constant taps and rattles, interspersed with rapid pulls of 18" and more. Try picking out the more 'subtle' barbel bites from that lot :rolleyes: Add to that the numerous chub present....to cut a long one short, it's waiting for 3' twitches or nothing on there :D

By and large, smaller hooks for smaller baits means lower B/S lines and so on...because everything has to be balanced to work efficiently. In the snag ridden small river jungles that many of us (Including Ian G) fish in, light tackle is not really advisable. Add crayfish into the mix....which seem to delight in turning braid into a loose weave tangled mess, and light mono into 1/2lb B/S kinky cotton...then light gear isn't even an option for legering. Feeder fishing with maggots is an expensive farce on my water, legered bread, cheese or paste is reduced to virtually an impossibility....and a worm is reduced to tattered shreds in minutes.

Big baits, big hooks and strong lines are the order of the day in some waters, whatever your views on big hooks frightening barbel off. If that means most of your fish come at night, then so be it....like Ian, I find the bigger fish seem to prefer the darker hours anyway. Whether that last is fanciful nonsense or not, I neither know nor care...I LIKE fishing into the dark, and for whatever reason, most of my bigger fish of several species have come at that time. Good enough reasons for me to fish those hours....with the added bonus of getting away with the heavier gear I feel safer using in those circumstances :D

Horses for courses, and any similar suitable cliches that come to mind :D

Cheers, Dave.
 
A different scenario Dave but just as compelling, as yet I don't have to contend with Cray Fish, but Eels this warm summer are a real problem, personally I don't like fishing beyond Dusk, to me that is the time I find that if they are gonna have they will, but there are no rules.

I hear that Kennet Barbel can often be caught in the day, just why there is a difference between your River, Dave and Howard's Kennet is a mystery.

As I said there are no rules.
 
Absolutely Neil. I used to fish a complex of small lakes on which the waters all fished better at night....with one exception, which fished better during the day :eek:

Work that one out :D

Keeps us all on our toes I guess :p

Cheers, Dave.
 
I suppose its fair to say , That what ever method you decide you use , Willl decide the out come of the size of the fish catch ? and I suppose it depends how single minded you are to trying to target bigger fish and the problem with using smaller baits with smaller hooks . Is that you end up hooking smaller fish and inturn spook any larger Barbel that might me in your swim .
 
Ian/Joe- interesting discussion this. But can I add to the mix, the weight of the hook? When feeding, barbel rely, mostly I think, on touch and smell and are clearly super efficient at filtering. So, when feeding on pellets say, are they ejecting hook baits (hair rigged pellets) because they sense the additional weight and resistance? How many times do we barbel anglers describe the knocks and rattles as the annoying activities of chub (or dace/roach/bream etc) when they could be barbel, picking up and then instantly ejecting the bait, never giving us time to strike (and because we are waiting for the 3ft twitch)? At these times I have often resorted to touch ledgering and this has often resulted in a fish because I have responded far more quickly to an early indication of a take. Imagining it has been chub causing the taps and rattles, I have then been surprised to be hooked into a barbel.

Of course barbel are greedy and a bit stupid so at some point a fish won't be able to resist so picks up the bait and moves off with sufficient confidence to enable a sold register on the rod tip. So for me, the relativity of bait size to hook size is important because of the weight dynamic and one thing I haven't really tried is using something to help counter balance the weight of the hook.

I think at night when barbel are naturally more confident, the balance between hook and bait size can be exaggerated. There will also be other scenarios when it won't seem to matter either. Very hungry fish feeding enthusiastically and competitively for example. I experienced that dynamic for the first time when fishing the Wye. Spells where you couldn't put the rod down after casting because of the almost instant take you would get ( even before the feeder had emptied).

Personally, with rigs etc, I think a barbel's behaviour and confidence is more impacted by what they feel/sense rather than what they see. Cover is vital to them to operate with a general feeling of confidence and darkness provides that in abundance allowing them to roam and feed more confidently.

I agree Howard, i think Barbel are far more likley to feel something wrong by a sense of touch, or by sensing the weight of the hook in that respect it's another argument for smaller hooks !
But there are many pieces that make up the jigsaw :p
I do believe that Barbel if not actually 'feeling' the hook by weight or by feel, can in some way 'sense' something is not right, a small Barbel not wise to the ways of the world may not yet be educated to these things, but a big Barbel, that may have been on the bank many times throughout it's life may well get a sense of danger as it approaches a bed of feed or our hookbait.
This is another piece of that jigsaw where the quality of your bait really counts i believe - possibly quality is the wrong word as i also believe that certain species are particularly attracted to certain types of food.
Whatever the answer - quality or preference - i'm confident enough in my bait that in the majority of cases where a Barbel is pulling, nudging, sucking or whatever it's doing - maybe to see if it can get this highly desireable little morsel to take off :eek: that eventually with no reaction from the bait it wont be able to help itself, and will take it .... Eventually - that's the importance of sitting on your hands, let it play for as long as it likes, but don't touch those twitchers !
Once it makes it's mistake and takes that hair rigged hook into it's mouth, unless it's by freaky chance, that hook is not likley coming back out again ! thats at least with something like a size 6, also helped by the larger bait that you would assume is being used.
Essentialy i'm hedging my bets, by using a large hook, compared to what some may use, i'm hoping that in forsaking a greater number of takes i will reduce the number of hook pulls to an absolute minimum, and yes i have had them even on size 6's.
2 seasons ago ( and i think i remember reporting it on the Loddon thread ) i tried going down to size 8's, resulting in two hook pulls in consequtive sessions, so i got the takes but no fish, i went back to 6's and no more hook pulls, at least not any time soon - it took me longer to get the takes but at least i put the Barbel on the bank.
There was a time when my standard hook for hair rigs was size 4, i hooked a reasonable amount of Barbel, and i can't recall any hook pulls at all, i reduced the size to see if i could get more takes, and did see an improvement without any hook pulls, at least not for some considerable time, though i did eventualy have one - and over the years a few more, they are rare enough that i consider the 6's to be the best option overall putting more fish - ( not that many but noticable ) on the bank, than the odd one i lose to a hook pull, some seassons i get none, others i've had one, and a few i've had a couple, i don't keep a record of them, but i don't think i'm telling fibs when i say i've never had more than 2 in a season.
So talking double figure Barbel - and the smaller as most will agree can fight much harder sometimes than the bigger ones, i'm certain that if the Barbel actually takes that 6 in on a hair ( not neccesarily true when a bait is mounted on the hook ) the chances of it ejecting it are very slim, and once hooked, you have a far greater chance of landing the Barbel.
Basically you are dealing with odds, there seems to me to be if you were to put it on a graph, a point of optimum size, which will put you more Barbel on the bank, whilst keeping your rate of takes at an acceptable level.

The things you need to consider i think are, the size of the Barbel you are likley ( or trying ) to catch, and the enviroment you are trying to catch them in, as to what size hook you feel is best suited, and more importantly you feel most confident in useing, whether from a point of view of more takes or more fish on the bank.

That's my case in a nutshell.

Ian.
 
Last edited:
Some interesting posts here for sure :)

My own experience on the Thames is similar to those on its tributaries. For whatever reason, I tend to catch during hours of darkness (not least of all because I tend to fish more at night). I'm certainly happiest with a size 6 or larger connected to some strong braid and mainline due to snag ridden nature of some swims. Size 6 feels good with the large pellets, 21mm and a similar 18 or 21mm boilies or else two smaller boilies trimmed down. Crayfish are not a problem but the lower reaches has its own evil, the mitten crabs :eek:

For large lumps of meat in high water, bigger sizes work well. However, for small boilies and pellets likely a size 8 is better and might well bring more bites. I have been using 8s this season so far with 15mm boilies and pellet wrapped in paste on the hook.

Tight lines!

Stephen
 
I suppose its fair to say , That what ever method you decide you use , Willl decide the out come of the size of the fish catch ? and I suppose it depends how single minded you are to trying to target bigger fish and the problem with using smaller baits with smaller hooks . Is that you end up hooking smaller fish and inturn spook any larger Barbel that might me in your swim .

The use of smaller hooks equates to smaller fish is not always the case is it Joe?

If you take the Wye then as you know the bigger fish will indeed snaffle up a 8mm pellet, as is the case this season when bites dried up with 12mm a switch to smaller hook and pellet brought two bonus fish over 9lbs and closer to 10.

But I appreciate in the case of the Wye barbel dictate, but to use smaller baits elsewhere can attract other species, as was the case on the WA recently when skimmers took a liking to small pellet.

In the case of large chub also, very often small 16 hooks will out-fish anything else, probably best to have no fixes ideas about anything, and be willing to try everything to get a bite.

Stop Press
Heavy rain forecast for tonight :p
 
Back
Top